Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25759 of 2018 Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Alias Arvind Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Yogendra Pal Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Amar Jeet Upadhyay
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
The allegation against the applicant is that he took Rs.15,00,000/- in cash from the informant to get him appointed as Vice President of the Uttar Pradesh Sahkari Grih Nirman Sangh Ltd. The allegation is of payment of money in cash, which cannot be decided in the present proceedings. The applicant has criminal history of five cases explained in the affidavit, filed in support of the bail application. He is in jail since 6.12.2017.
On the other hand learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018)3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Arvind Kumar alias Arvind Singh involved in Case Crime No.274 of 2017, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, I.P.C, Police Station Mawana, District Meerut be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected of the commission of which they are suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the complainant is free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this court.
Order Date :- 23.8.2018 T. Sinha