Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

M/S.Aruppukottai Sri Jayavilas ... vs Tamilnadu Generation And ...

Madras High Court|21 September, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The writ petition has been filed challenging the correctness of the impugned circular bearing No.Memo.No.CE/Comml/EE3/AEE2/F.Harmonics/D.589/13 dated 19.08.2013, issued by the Chief Engineer ? Commercial, Chennai second respondent herein in so far as the petitioner is concerned and the consequential Demand notices issued by the fourth respondent to quash the same and to forbear the respondents 1 to 4 their men, officers, agents, servants, representatives and/or any one claiming through or under them and/or any other person from in any manner insisting on harmonic control and levying, demanding and/or collecting charges and compensation for harmonics dumping from the petitioner for his HT SC number either through the CC Bills or in any other manner connected with 11 kv supply lines.
2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 4.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved in the writ petition is covered by a decision made in a batch of writ petition in W.P.Nos.25 of 2015 dated 05.06.2017. The relevant portion of the said order is extracted hereunder:
?In view of Regulation 4(1)(iv) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code, although the State has got power to direct the consumers to install harmonic filters irrespective of their voltage connection as stated by learned Additional Advocate General for the TANGEDCO, the same cannot be sustained in view of non-specification of any standard of harmonics for 11 kv/22kv/supply line consumers by the CEA, who, being an Apex Body as per Section 73(d) of the Act, has exclusive powers to specify the Grid Standards for operation and maintenance of transmission lines.
Thus, for all the reasons stated above, the impugned demands are quashed. Consequently, the writ petitions are allowed. No costs.?
4.After this order, it was also brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the order passed by this Court has been followed by the Tamilnadu Electricity Regulatory Commission for determination of Tariff for Generation and Distribution in its order in TP No.1 of 2017 dated 11.08.2017, wherein, it has been incorporated as under:
?6.1.1.2 Harmonics:
a..... (b)It shall not be applicable for all HT consumers connected at 11 kv and 22 kv until the CEA prescribes any standard of harmonics for 11 kv/22kv supply line consumers and makes them also obligatory for harmonic controls.?
5. In view of the above said order dated 05.06.2017, all this writ petition stands allowed and the impugned demand notice is quashed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
To
1.The Chairman and Managing Director, Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution corporation Limited (TANGEDCO) No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.
2.The Chief Engineer ? Commercial, TANGEDCO., 144, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.
3.The Chief Financial Controller ? Revenue TANGEDCO., 144, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.
4.Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory, Commission,(TNERC) TIDCO Office Building, No.19-A, Rukmini Lakshmipathy Salai, Marshall's Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. .
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S.Aruppukottai Sri Jayavilas ... vs Tamilnadu Generation And ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
21 September, 2017