Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Arun Rai vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 49883 of 2021 Applicant :- Arun Rai Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Vimal Kumar Pandey,Balwant Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Heard Sri Balwant Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No. 630 of 2021, under Section 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, 34 of I.P.C.
and 60, 62, 72 of Excise Act, registered at P.S.- Kotwali Khalilabad, District- Sant Kabir Nagar.
Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant has not committed the alleged offence. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the applicant. The recovery of alleged liquor shown against the applicant in the recovery memo, is false and fabricated. He has nothing to do with the present case and he has only taken lift in the vehicle in which the said liquor was recovered. There is no independent witness in the present case. The allegations levelled against the applicant are fully false and baseless and case under aforementioned Sections is not made out against him. Further submitted that prosecution story is highly improbable and concocted one, upon which no reliance can be placed. The applicant is languishing in jail since 17.09.2021.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the facts as raised by the learned counsel for the applicant.
Nature of accusation, evidence collected by I.O. in support of the charge, gravity of offence, nature and severity of punishment in case of conviction, complicity of the accused and all other attending circumstances were duly considered.
Considering the rival submissions of learned counsel for the parties, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, a case for bail is made out.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Arun Rai involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions;
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.
2. The applicant shall co-operate with the trial and shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for charge, evidence when the witnesses are present in the court, statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and argument.
3. During trial, he shall not indulge in any criminal activities.
In breach of any condition enumerated above, Trial Court shall be at liberty to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 23.12.2021 VPS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Arun Rai vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 December, 2021
Judges
  • Anil Kumar Ojha
Advocates
  • Vimal Kumar Pandey Balwant Singh