Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Arun Kumar vs State By Kadugondana Halli

High Court Of Karnataka|11 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. N. PHANEENDRA CRL.P. NO. 9340/2018 BETWEEN ARUN KUMAR S/O. RAJENDRAN AGED 21 YEARS R/AT. NO.6, 3RD CROSS 8TH MAIN, VEERANNA PALYA BENGALURU – 560 032 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. ZAMEER PASHA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND STATE BY KADUGONDANA HALLI POLICE REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU – 560 001 … RESPONDENT (BY SRI. HONNAPPA, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.277/2018 (C.C.NO.58199/2018) REGISTERED BY KADUGONDANA HALLI POLICE STATION, BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/Ss. 120(B), 143, 147, 148, 504, 114, 302 R/W 149 OF IPC.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER The matter having been passed over in the Morning Session, when called in the Afternoon Session, neither the petitioner nor his counsel present before the court. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
The order sheet discloses that, four opportunities have been granted to comply with the office objections. But, so far the office objections have not been complied with. This indicates that, the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the case. Therefore, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE KGR*
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Arun Kumar vs State By Kadugondana Halli

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
11 November, 2019
Judges
  • K N Phaneendra