IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.53057 OF 2018 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
ARRIS Solutions, Inc., Having its Principal place of Business at 3871, Lakefield Drive, Suwanee, Georgia 30024, USA, Represented by its authorized Signatory – Sandeep Agarwal.
(By Ms. Alka Tripathi, Advocate for Sri. Ajay J. Nandalike, Advocate) AND:
E-Infrastructure and Entertainment India Private Limited, Having its registered office at: No.22 and 24, Someshware Nilayam, Jakkur Main Road, Amruthalli, Bengaluru – 560 092. Karnataka, India.
… Petitioner … Respondent (By Sri. Bonny Keriyappa, Advocate for C/R;
Vide order dated 27.11.2018 Sri.K.Satish, Adv. Undertakes to file power for C/R;
M/s. Gawry Cootaiah, Advocate for Sri. C. K. Nandakumar, Advocate) This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned order dated 23.11.2018 passed by the XXXVIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru sitting in Court Hall No.39 in City Civil Court, Bengaluru, in I.A.No.01/2018 in AA No.439/2018 at Annexure – A and etc., This Petition coming on for Orders, this day, the Court made the following:-
ORDER Ms. Alka Tripathi, learned counsel for Sri. Ajay J. Nandalike, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Ms. Gawry Cootaiah, learned counsel for Sri. C.K. Nandakumar, learned counsel for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that in this petition, petitioner has challenged the interim order passed in the proceeding under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short).
2. It is further submitted that proceeding under Section 9 of the Act has been withdrawn. Therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition.
3. The aforesaid statement is taken on record.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE Mds/-
AAJ:
01.04.2019 WP No.53057/2018 ORDER ON ‘FOR BEING SPOKEN TO’ It is stated in the memo that a typographical error has crept in the order dated 11.03.2019 passed in W.P.No.53057/2018 and the name of the learned counsel for the respondent has shown incorrectly as ‘Ms.Gawry Cootaiah, Advocate for Sri.C.K.Nandakumar, Advocate’ instead of ‘Sri.Raghuram Cadambi, Advocate for Sri.C.K.Nandakumar, Advocate’.
This order shall be read in conjunction with the order dated 11.03.2019.
Sd/- JUDGE ln.