The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:
“i) to call for assessment records for the years 2006-07 to 2008-09 and to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or direction, quashing Exhibit P3 to P5 series of notices issued by the 1st respondent;
ii) to issue a writ of certiorari or such other writ, order directing a stay of Ext.P3 to P5 series of notices, admit the matter and direct to tag along with P7 series of writ petitions pending along with other connected cases, in the interest of justice; and
iii) to pass such other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem justified, to the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. Obviously, the challenge now raised by the petitioner is against Exts.3 to P5 series notices. The learned Counsel for the petitioner points out that they are barred by limitation. This Court does not find it necessary to go into such aspects as the writ petition is premature. It is always open for the petitioner to submit necessary objections, including plea of limitation in W.P.(C)No. 28286 OF 2014 2 response to such notices. It is for the concerned authority to have the same considered and pass appropriate orders on merits, if not finalised so far. Accordingly, interference is declined and the writ petition is dismissed.
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE lk