Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1984 of 2021 Applicant :- Arif Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Kumar Swamy Tripathi,Rajesh Kumar Kanojia Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sunil Kumar Tiwari,Sunil Kumar Tiwari
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Counter affidavit filed by learned A.G.A is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant; Sri Sunil Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed with a prayer to grant an anticipatory bail to the applicant, Arif, in Case Crime No. 382 of 2020, under Sections- 376, 452, 506, 120-B IPC, Police Station- Jani, District- Meerut.
Prior notice of this bail application was served in the office of Government Advocate and as per Chapter XVIII, Rule 18 of the Allahabad High Court Rules and as per direction dated 20.11.2020 of this Court in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. No. 8072 of 2020, Govind Mishra @ Chhotu Versus State of U.P.,hence, this anticipatory bail application is being heard. Grant of further time to the learned A.G.A as per Section 438 (3) Cr.P.C. (U.P. Amendment) is not required.
By the order dated 05.02.2021 the applicant was enlarged on anticipatory bail. The applicant alleges implication in the case by way of counter blast to the FIR dated 09.09.20202. The implication in the present case is on account of matrimonial dispute no counter has been filed by counsel for the informant.
The applicant has already been enlarged on interim anticipatory bail by order dated 05.02.2021.
The order is confirmed.
Applicant will remain on anticipatory bail till cognizance is taken by the court on the police report u/s 173 (2) Cr.P.C. on same terms and conditions as mentioned in the order dated 05.02.2021.
The anticipatory bail application is allowed to the aforementioned extent.
Order Date :- 6.4.2021 Rohit