IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.5645/2017 (CS-EL/M) BETWEEN :
THE SECRETARY AREHALLI MILK MANUFACTURES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY AREHALLI MILK HAALU UTPAADAKARA SAHAKARA SANGHA AREHALLI VILLAGE, KUTTAGAL HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT – 562 159 REPRESENTED BY SAGAR.P S/O PILLEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS SECRETARY AREHALLI MILK MANUFACTURES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY ...APPELLANT (BY SRI HALESHA R.G, ADVOCATE) AND :
1. A.R.TRIMURTHY S/O RAGHURAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS AREHALLI VILLAGE KUTTAGAL HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK AND RAMANAGARA DISTRICT – 562 159 2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY RAMANAGARA SUB-DIVISION RAMANAGARA – 562 159 3. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR DEPUTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE COMPLEX ROOM NO.401, 3RD FLOOR B.M.ROAD RAMANAGARA – 562 159 ...RESPONDENTS (GA SERVED) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 01.09.2017 IN WP NO.32339/2017 [CS-EL/M] PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE WHEREBY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE HAS QUASHED THE WELL SPEAKING INTERIM ORDER DATED 30.06.2017 AND CONFIRMED THE IMPUGNED INTERIM ORDER DATED 20.06.2017 PASSED BY THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, RAMANAGARA, PRODUCED IN WRIT PETITION AS ANNEXURE-P.
THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT Ag.CJ (Oral):
1. Heard. This writ appeal is directed against the order dated 01.09.2017 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court allowing first respondent’s Writ Petition No.32339/2017.
2. By the aforesaid order, the learned Single Judge has set aside the order dated 30.06.2017 passed by the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies on the ground that no reasons are assigned by him for vacating of the interim stay order. The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies is directed to reconsider the matter in accordance with law.
3. We find no ground to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed. In view of dismissal of the appeal, IA No.1/2017 filed for interim stay also stands dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Sd/-
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/-
JUDGE KSR