Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Archan vs Since Mrs. Mauna

High Court Of Gujarat|27 March, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) This Appeal is ADMITTED on the following substantial questions of law:
[1] Whether the Tribunal below committed substantial error of law in affirming the order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ["the Act"], by totally overlooking the fact that notice issued under Section 263 did not disclose the relevant criteria for exercising jurisdiction under the said provision.
[2] Whether the Tribunal below committed substantial error of law in overlooking the fact that in order to get benefit under Section 80IB[10] of the Act, it is not necessary that developer must be the owner but that was the basis of issue of notice under Section 263 of the Act.
Since Mrs. Mauna Bhatt has already entered appearance on behalf of the respondent, we propose to fix the matter for final hearing on April 9, 2012.
[BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, ACTING CJ.] [J.B.PARDIWALA, J.] pirzada/-
Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Archan vs Since Mrs. Mauna

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
27 March, 2012