Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Kerala
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Aravindan vs Ushakumari

High Court Of Kerala|25 November, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The suit as originally filed is one for a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction. Leave was sought thereafter to amend the plaint incorporating a prayer for recovery of possession also. This is on the basis of the report of the Advocate Commissioner deputed in the suit. 2. The mere fact that the plaint is allowed to be amended does not mean that the amended reliefs could be granted. Whether the reliefs could be granted or not is a matter to be decided in the suit after trial. The defendant can after all file an additional written statement to the amended plaint on the basis of which additional issues could be raised.
I do not find any infirmity in the order impugned warranting interference in this supervisory jurisdiction. The Original Petition is dismissed subject to the above reservation.
Sd/-
V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.
nj.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Aravindan vs Ushakumari

Court

High Court Of Kerala

JudgmentDate
25 November, 2014
Judges
  • V Chitambaresh