Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mr Aravind Narayanaswamy vs Mrs Vandana D/O Balasubramanian

High Court Of Karnataka|12 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION No.31029/2018 (GM-FC) BETWEEN:
MR. ARAVIND NARAYANASWAMY S/O NARAYANSWAMY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT #23, HOYERSWER DAER STRASSE, DRESDEN-01099.
GERMANY. REP. BY SPA HOLDER SMT.ANUSUYA W/O SRI NARAYANASAMI, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, #27, KASI CHETTY STREET, WORAIYUR, TIRUCHINAPALLY-620 003, TAMIL NADU.
... PETITIONER (BY MS.ANUSHA, ADV., FOR SRI K.G.KAMATH, ADVOCATE) AND:
MRS VANDANA D/O BALASUBRAMANIAN, W/O ARAVIND NARAYANSWAMY, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT #310, 15TH CROSS, RMV 2ND STAGE, DOLLARS COLONY, BENGALURU-560 094.
... RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH/MODIFY ORDER PASSED BY THE III ADDITIONAL FAMILY JUDGE, AT BANGALORE CITY DTD 20.02.2017 ON THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT IA NO.7 UNDER SECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE READ WITH SECTION 12 OF GUARDIAN AND WARDS ACT IN G & WC NO.53 OF 2017 VIDE ANNX-A AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Ms. Anusha, learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 10.07.2019 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties on 27.06.2019.
2. The aforesaid memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE PB
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mr Aravind Narayanaswamy vs Mrs Vandana D/O Balasubramanian

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
12 July, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe