Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

A.Radhakrishnan vs The Joint Registrar Of ...

Madras High Court|22 June, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The petitioner, who was working as a Salesman in the second respondent Society, even after attaining the age of superannuation on 30.6.2016 and thereupon an order was also passed allowing him to retire from service with the disbursement of Rs.50,000/- as part payment of his retiral benefits, has not been till date disbursed with the remaining retiral benefits, namely, gratuity, provident fund, encashment of earned leave and unearned leave to his credit. Therefore, he has filed a statutory revision before the first respondent on 28.11.2016. As the petitioner is facing financial hardship in view of non-disbursement of part of the retiral benefits mentioned above, the first respondent should have considered the statutory revision on priority basis. Since he has not done so, a direction may be issued, he pleaded.
2. Mr.L.P.Shanmughasundaram, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents sought for sufficient time to dispose the statutory revision filed by the petitioner.
3. This Court, considering the limited prayer made by the petitioner for disposal of his revision for non-payment of part of the retiral benefits as mentioned above, hereby directs the first respondent to consider and dispose of the pending revision within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

A.Radhakrishnan vs The Joint Registrar Of ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
22 June, 2017