Heard Mr. Dhaval D. Vyas for the petitioners.
It is submitted that, by the impugned order, the trial court allowed the amendment, as prayed for in the application dated 6.8.2011 preferred by the plaintiff, respondent herein, which, virtually, replaces the entire plaint and nature of the suit and such amendment could not have been granted. Even the pleadings in the amendment application run counter to the pleadings in the plaint about possession of the suit land.
Considering the above, Rule.
Ad-interim relief in terms of paragraph 11(B).
Notice as to interim relief returnable on 14.8.2012.
(ANANT S. DAVE, J.) (swamy) Top