Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Appearance vs 3.2002

High Court Of Gujarat|03 July, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)
1. We have heard Ms. Sejal Mandavia, learned standing counsel for Central Excise and Customs Department.
2. Admit.
3.0 We formulate the following substantial question of law.
"
Whether or not in view of provisions of Rule 6(2), Rule 6(3)(b) and sub rule 5 of Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, CESTAT is right in holding that the assessee is not required to pay an amount equal to eight per cent/ ten percent of the total price, excluding sales tax and other taxes, if any, paid on such goods, on the final product cleared under exemption vide exemption Not. No.6/2002-CE, dated 01.03.2002, issued under Section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944?"
4.0 Issue Notice to the respondent. Paper-book be ready within three months.
[V.
M. SAHAI, J.] [N.
V. ANJARIA, J.] Amit Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Appearance vs 3.2002

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
03 July, 2012