IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27.02.2017 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE S.VIMALA C.M.P.No.1877 of 1995 and C.M.A.No.SR42785 of 1993 Aparna @ Renu ... Petitioner / Appellant versus M.Ganesh ... Respondent/Respondent Prayer : C.M.P.No.1877 of 1995 filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, seeking to condone the delay of 8 days in preferring the appeal.
Prayer : C.M.A.No.SR42785 of 1993 filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, against the decree and Judgment dated 05.03.1993, made in I.A.No.192 of 1992 in F.C.O.P.No.662 of 1990, on the file of the Additional Family Court, Madras.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : No appearance
ORDER
When the matter was posted under the caption “For Dismissal” on 14.02.2017, later, at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the caption “For Dismissal” was removed and it was again posted on 24.02.2017. Now, even today, there is no representation. Hence, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, CMA.Sr. is rejected. No costs.
27.02.2017 ogy
Dr.S.VIMALA, J.
ogy To The Additional Family Court, Madras.
C.M.P.No.1877 of 1995 and C.M.A.No.SR42785 of 1993 27.02.2017