IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NOS.32330-332 OF 2017(EDN.MED.ADM) BETWEEN :
1. APARNA MACHARLA, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF GOVINDA RAJU MACHARLA, APARTMENT NO.5043, SOBHA JASMINE, BELLANDUR, BENGALURU – 560 103.
2. SURABHI AGARWAL, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF RAKESH AGARWAL, RESIDENT OF NO.2A-804, DIVYASHREE ELAN HOMES, SARJAPUR ROAD, OPPOSITE TOTAL MALL, KALKONDRA HALLI, CARMELRAM, BENGALURU – 560 035.
3. AMI MEHUL MEHTA, AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS, MINOR, DAUGHTER OF MEHUL MEHTA, RESIDING AT D4 MIMS ESPACIO, JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU – 560 064. REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MEHUL MEHTA. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI.AJOY KUMAR PATIL, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND :
1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF OVERSEAS INDIAN AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI – 110 001.
2. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, NIRMAN BHAVAN, NEW DELHI – 110 011.
3. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF HEALTH SERVICES, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NIRMAN BHAVAN, NEW DELHI – 110 011.
4. THE MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA, POCKET 14, SECTOR 8, DWARAKA, NEW DELHI – 110 077, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SINCHANA M.R., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3, SRI.N.KHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENTS NO. 2 AND 3 TO PERMIT THE PETITIONERS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE ONGOING COUNSELLING PROCESS, SEAT SELECTION AND ALLOTMENT OF MBBS SEATS FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2017-18 FOR ADMISSION TO THE UNDER GRADUATE MBBS/BDS COURSES IN DEEMED UNIVERSITIES IN THE MANAGEMENT CATEGORY OF SEATS AND ALLOW THEM TO CHOOSE THE SAID MANAGEMENT CATEGORY SEATS IN DEEMED UNIVERSITIES, ON THE BASIS OF THEIR MERIT.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER None appears for the petitioners nor there is any representation. On 03.10.2017 also he was absent and the petitions were adjourned. It is apparent that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting these petitions. Hence, the petitions are dismissed.
SD/- SD/-
JUDGE JUDGE SPS