IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA WRIT PETITION Nos.6024-6026/2017 (GM CPC) BETWEEN:
KALAVATHI, D/O. LATE SIDDARANGAIAH, W/O. GANESH SINGH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. SATAGHATTA VILLAGE, U RDIGERE HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT PIN 572101. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI RAVISHANKAR SHASTRY G, ADV.) AND:
1. ANUSUYA S/o CHIKKANNA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, VADEKAL, URGDIGERE HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK & DISTRICT. PIN 572101.
2. SMT. LAKSHMIDEVAMMA W/O. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, D/O. LATE SIDDARANGAIAH KALLAHALLI, URDIGERE HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK & DISTRICT. PIN 572101.
3. NAGARATHNA, W/O. RANGANATHA, D/O. LATE SIDDARANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O. 6TH MAIN ROAD, YALAHANKA, BANGALORE PIN 570064.
4. MANJUNATHA S/O LATE SIDDARANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. SATAGHATTA VILLAGE, URDIGERE HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK & DISTRICT. PIN 572 101.
5. NAYAZULLA KHAN, S/O. AMANULLA KHAN, MAJOR, R/O. SATAGHATTA VILLAGE, URDIGERE HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK & DISTRICT. PIN 572101.
6. NOORUNNISA W/O. ABDUL SHAHID @ ANSWAR AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT SATAGHATTA VILLAE, URDIGERE HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT.
PIN 572101. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI S R HEGDE HUDLAMANE, ADV. FOR R6, R2, R4 & R5 – SERVED.) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE COMMON ORDER ON APPLICATIONS FILED UNDER ORDER 18 RULE 17 R/W SEC. 151 & SEC. 151 OF CPC IN O.S.432/2007 DATED 09.01.2017 PASSED BY THE LEARNED V ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TUMAKURU AT ANNEX-A AND CONSEQUENTLY THE APPLICATIONS MAY BE ALLOWED AS PRAYED FOR ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R These writ petitions are filed against the common order dated 09.01.2017 on Order 18 Rule 17 read with Section 151 of CPC and Section 151 of CPC in O.S.No.432/2007 on the file of the V Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, at Tumakuru ['Trial Court' for short].
2. It is discerned that the said O.S.No.432/2007 has been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, writ petitions do not survive for consideration.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petitions stand dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE NC.
CT-HR