Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Anurag Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 49
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23268 of 2019 Petitioner :- Anurag Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
The petitioner is aggrieved by the preliminary enquiry which was conducted by the Supply Inspector. If that is the case, then he may place his case before the Enquiry Officer i.e. District Supply Officer. There is no requirement of changing the Enquiry Officer at all.
The District Supply Officer will not depend on the preliminary enquiry but would enquire the matter independently.
This exercise would be completed within a period of one month from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before the District Supply Officer.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 30.7.2019 praveen.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Anurag Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 July, 2019
Judges
  • Siddhartha Varma
Advocates
  • Dharmendra Pratap Singh