Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Anuj Kumar vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 October, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36138 of 2018 Petitioner :- Anuj Kumar Respondent :- State Of U P And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravi Kant Vikram Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Awadhesh Kumar Saxena
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has disputed the electricity bill for the period i.e. from 11.2.2018 to 25.3.2018 filed as annexure-2 to the writ petition.
Sri Shyam Singh Yadav, learned counsel holding brief of Sri Awadhesh Kumar Saxena, learned counsel representing the respondent No.2 submits that the petitioner has remedy of filing a representation before the Executive Engineer for correction of bill under paragraph 6.5 of the Supply Code, 2005.
The writ petition is disposed of with the direction that in case the petitioner files a representation before the respondent No.2, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, as far as possible, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
Order Date :- 30.10.2018 Ashish Tripathi (Ajay Bhanot,J .) (Abhinava Upadhya,J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Anuj Kumar vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 October, 2018
Judges
  • Abhinava Upadhya
Advocates
  • Ravi Kant Vikram