Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Anshu Yadav @ Govind Yadav vs State Of U.P.

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|17 August, 2021

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard Sri Yogesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has not committed present offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that in this matter, trial has commenced. Almost all the witnesses of fact have been examined including the eye account witnesses. None has supported the prosecution case. First information report was lodged on the basis of information received by the father of the deceased. He was not an eye account witness. Eye account witness has also not supported the prosecution case. It is further argued applicant is languishing in jail since 29.9.2020 having no criminal antecedents. In case applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.
On the other hand, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused, scrutinizing the facts mentioned in the F.I.R., statement of witnesses, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Anshu Yadav @ Govind Yadav involved in Case Crime No.237 of 2020 under Section 302 IPC, Police Station South, District - Firozabad be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions :
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
4. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.
The party shall file self-attested computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court, Allahabad. The concerned Court / Authority / Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
It is made clear that submissions and observations recorded in this order are only for the purpose of deciding the bail application. Trial court will not be influenced with the same while deciding the trial.
Order Date :- 17.8.2021 ss
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Anshu Yadav @ Govind Yadav vs State Of U.P.

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
17 August, 2021
Judges
  • Om Prakash Vii