Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2492 of 2005 Petitioner :- Ansar Husain Respondent :- Nagar Palika Parishad Thru' Executive Officer And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prakash Padia,Dr. R.G. Padia,V.K. Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prem Chandra Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs :
"(i) A writ, order or direction, including a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 31.7.2004 (Annexure 16 to the writ petition).
(ii) A writ, order of direction, including a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 27.7.2004 passed by the District Magistrate, Budaun (Annexure 17 to the writ petition), a reference of which has been given in the order dated 31.7.2004.
(iii) A writ, order of direction, including a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner on the post of Junior Engineer (Civil) in view of the order dated 1.7.2004 passed by the Commissioner & Director, Local Bodies, U. P. Lucknow and also in view of the fact that the proposal of the petitioner's regularisation on the post of Junior Engineer (Civil) has been sent by the respondent nos.1 and 2 vide letter no.1845/XIII-04 dated 14.7.2004 (Annexure 15 to the writ petition).
(iv) A writ, order or direction, including a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner on the post of Junior Engineer (Civil) in view of his very long services on the post of Junior Engineer (Civil) i.e. more than 14 years continuously.
(v) A writ, order or direction, including a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Director, Local Bodies, U. P. Lucknow to decide the pending representation of the petitioner dated 22.9.2004 and preferably within a period of six weeks by passing a speaking order (Annexure 18 to the writ petition).
(vi) Any other suitable writ, order of direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
(vii) Award costs of the writ petition throughout to the petitioner."
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 27.4.2018
Manish Himwan