IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE The Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.M.Shyam Prasad Regular Second Appeal No. 2141 OF 2016 Between:
ANNAPURNAMMA DEAD BY LRS’ 1. T.G. CHANNABASAVARAJU SON OF LAT E SRI. T.G. GANGAPPA AGED 62 YEARS, RESIDENT OF VINAYAKA NAGAR TUMAKURU – 572 101.
2. DR. T.G. VIJAYALAKSHMI WIFE OF LATE SRI. B. NATARAJ RESIDENT OF NO. 565, 5TH CROSS 7TH MAIN ROAD, GANGANAGAR BENGALURU – 560 032.
... APPELLANTS (BY SMT.SOWMYA LAKSHMI BHAT., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) And:
FATHIMA KHANUM WIFE OF NAZIM AHMED RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 56 E.W.S 3RD CROSS JAYAPURA EXTENSION TUMAKURU – 572 101.
... RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC 1908, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DATED 07.09.2016 PASSEDIN R.A.NO. 26/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM, TUMKURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.02.2013 PASSED IN OS. NO. 822/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC-III TUMKURU.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellants. This Court on 19.07.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting two weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this preemptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/- Judge SA Ct:sr