Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ankul Sharma Alias Ankur vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26589 of 2016 Applicant :- Ankul Sharma Alias Ankur Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Noor Muhammad,Piyush Dubey,Yogesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Upendra Upadhyay
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Heard Sri Piyush Dubey, learned counsel for applicant, Sri Upendra Upadhyay, learned counsel for complainant and learned A.G.A. for State.
2. The present bail application has been moved by accused- applicant for enlarging him on bail in Case Crime No. 66 of 2016, under Sections 376, 366, 506 IPC, Police Station Bagwala, District Etah.
3. It is contended by counsel for applicant that he has been falsely implicated but has filed supplementary affidavit in which statement of victim during trial has been annexed in which she specifically stated that applicant has committed rape on her and has supported the prosecution version.
4. Looking to entire facts and circumstances, at this stage, I do not find it a fit case for grant of bail.
5. Application is accordingly rejected.
Order Date :- 30.7.2019 KA
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ankul Sharma Alias Ankur vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 July, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Noor Muhammad Piyush Dubey Yogesh Kumar Srivastava