Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 56008 of 2019 Applicant :- Ankujpal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Geetam Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Ankujpal with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 321 of 2019, under Sections 376, 506 IPC, and section 3/4 of Protection of Children From Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Police Station Ganjdundwara, District- Kasganj, during pendency of trial.
It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with some ulterior motive.It is submitted that as per medical report the age of the victim is sevenths years.Given margin of two years she can be considered to be major.From the allegation in the First Information Report it is clear that mother of the victim has implicated the applicant alongwith his brother Ajit.However victim in her statement under section 164 Cr.P.c. has not made any allegation against the brother of the applicant Ajit.She has only implicated the applicant.It is further submitted that if the First Information Report read with statement of the victim under section 164 Cr.P.C. it is clear that only after mother of the victim came victim has made allegation against the applicant.The medical report does not supports the allegation made in the First Information Report.The victim was consenting relationship with the applicant. It The applicant is languishing in jail since 31.10.2019, who is not a previous convict. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserves any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.
Having considered the submissions of the parties noted above, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 17.12.2019 Atul kr. sri.