1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ankit Yadav vs State Of U P And Ors

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 April, 2019


Court No. - 70
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 17022 of 2019 Applicant :- Ankit Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Ors Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Kapil Dev Singh Rathore
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Ajay Kumar Upadhyay, learned counsel for the O.P. No.2.
The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash chargesheet dated 13.06.2014 arising out of Case Crime No.193 of 2014, cognizance order dated 20.12.2016 and the proceedings of Special Trial No.75 of 2017 (State vs.Ankit Yadav), under Section 135 Indian Electricity Act, Police Station- Shahpur, District- Gorakhpur.
It has been stated that the offence alleged is compoundable. The applicant is ready to settle the matter with the opposite party no.
2. Reliance has also been placed on a recent Supreme Court decision in the case of Suresh Ganpati Halvankar Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. in Criminal Appeal No. 156 of 2018, decided on 22.01.2018.
Considering the above, the present application is disposed of with the following directions:
i) the applicant shall pay up the entire electricity dues as claimed, up to date, within a period of three weeks from today.
ii) upon payment of the electricity dues, the applicant shall, within a week therefrom file before the learned court below an application seeking compounding of the offence, as alleged and deposit the compounding charges.
iii) any amount that may have been deposited either towards electricity dues or compounding charges may be adjusted against the amount that may be claimed against the applicant.
iv) upon proof of payment of the electricity dues and the compounding charges, if any, the learned court below shall decide the application for compounding filed by the applicant, in accordance with law before proceedings further, with the trial.
v) for a period of one month from today, and in the event of continued compliance being made by the applicant (of this order and also of the further directions that may be issued by the learned court below, within time as may be granted by it), coercive measures may not be adopted against the applicant till disposal of the compounding application.
vi) in the event of default on part of the applicant, the protection being granted by this order shall stand lifted and the applicant may be dealt with as if this order had not been passed.
With the aforesaid directions, the present application is disposed of.
Order Date :- 29.4.2019 SKD
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.

Ankit Yadav vs State Of U P And Ors


High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

29 April, 2019
  • Sanjay Kumar Singh
  • Manoj Kumar