1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Ankit vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|12 October, 2018


Court No. - 4
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 29535 of 2018 Petitioner :- Ankit Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Narayan Singh(Kushwaha) Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Bala Krishna Narayana,J. Hon'ble Ravindra Nath Kakkar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer to quash the F.I.R. Dated 26.09.2018 registered as Case Crime No.114 of 2018, under sections 354-A, 506 IPC and 67 Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, PS Sakrauli, District Etah.
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegations made in the impugned FIR regarding commission of offence by the petitioner under aforesaid sections are palpably false and moreover the same do not disclose any cognizable offence. The impugned FIR is thus liable to be quashed.
From the perusal of the F.I.R., it appears that on the basis of the allegations made therein, prima facie cognizable offence is made out. There is no ground for interference with the F.I.R. Therefore, the prayer for quashing the impugned F.I.R. is refused.
However, considering the nature of the allegations made in the F.I.R. and submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, it is directed that in case the petitioner appears before the court concerned within thirty days from today and applies for bail, the same shall be heard and disposed of expeditiously by the courts below in view of the settled law laid down by the Seven Judges' decision of this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2005 Cr.L.J. 755 which has been affirmed by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.
reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC).
It is further provided that if the investigation in this matter has been completed and police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. has been filed, the petitioner shall not be entitled to any benefit of this order.
With the above directions, this petition is disposed of finally.
Order Date :- 12.10.2018 Sazia
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.

Ankit vs State Of U P And Others


High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

12 October, 2018
  • Bala Krishna Narayana
  • Narayan Singh Kushwaha