Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Ankit Kaushik And Another vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|08 April, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 38
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8831 of 2021 Applicant :- Ankit Kaushik And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Mahendra Pratap,Anurag Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. This anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants - Ankit Kaushik, Jignesh Kaushik, seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.119 of 2020, under Sections -420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 506 I.P.C., Police Station - Baraut, District - Baghpat, during pendency of trial.
3. In view of the direct fact allegation made in the FIR and looking into the nature of offence as alleged, the discretion claimed for grant of anticipatory bail is declined.
4. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is rejected, leaving it open to the applicants to apply for regular bail, which application when filed may be dealt with on its own merit as expeditiously as possible, without being prejudiced by any observation made in this order.
Order Date :- 8.4.2021 A.Dewal
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ankit Kaushik And Another vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
08 April, 2021
Judges
  • Saumitra Dayal Singh
Advocates
  • Mahendra Pratap Anurag Yadav