IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY R.F.A.No.608 OF 2015 BETWEEN:
1. Anis Ahemad Khan S/o Late B.S.Nazeer Hussain Khan, Aged about 57 years, Occ: Business R/at No.39/1, Mavalia Tank Bund Road, Kalasipalyam, Bangalore-02.
2. Fasi Ahemad Khan S/o Late B.S.Nazeer Hussain Khan, Aged about 51 years, Occ:Business, R/at No.39/1, Mavalia Tank Bund Road, Kalasipalyam, Bangalore-02.
3. Safi Ahemad Khan S/o Late B.S.Nazeer Hussain Khan, Aged about 50 years, Occ:Business, R/at no.39/1, Mavalia Tank Bund Road, Kalasipalyam, Bangalore-02.
4. Saeed Ahemad Khan S/o Late B.S.Nazeer Hussain Khan, Aged about 42 years, Occ:Business, R/at no.39/1, Mavalia Tank Bund Road, Kalasipalyam Bangalore-02.
5. Parveen Khan D/o Late B.S.Nazeer Hussain Khan, Aged about 57 years, R/o 96/1, R.V.Road, Lalbagh West Gate, Bangalore-04.
6. Fatima Khan D/o Late B.S.Nazeer Hussain Khan Aged about 50 years, R/at no.17, 13th Cross, Jayamahal Extension Bangalore-46.
7. Aisha Khan D/o Late B.S.Nazeer Hussain Khan, Aged aobut 44 years, R/at No.73, 1st Cross, Masjid Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore-51. .. Appellants ( By Sri. Nataraj G, Advocate ) AND:
1. Ramanna S/o Gundappa, Aged about 67 years, R/at Municipal No.39/1, Hameed Khan Garden, MTB Road, Kalasipalyam Bangalore-02.
2. Rajamma W/o Ramanna Aged about 60 years, Occ:House Wife, R/at Municipal No.39/1, Hameed Khan Garden, MTB Road, Kalasipalyam Bangalore-02.
3. Madhu S/o Ramanna, Aged about 30 years, Occ:Business, R/at Municipal No.39/1, Hameed Khan Garden MTB Road, Kalasipalyam Bangalore-02.
4. Panshila W/o Mylu Aged about 33 years, Occ:Housewife, (daughter of defendant-1 Ramanna) R/at Municipal No.39/1 Hameedkhan Garden MTB Road, Kalasipalyam Bangalore-02.
Defendant No.1 to 4 are now R/at Madhu Fruit and Juice Centre, No.13/5, Rangappa Reddy Complex, Minerva Circle, R.V.Road, Bangalore-04. .. Respondents (By Sri. Narayanaswamy K, Advocate for C/R -1 to R-4) This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 7.3.2015, passed in O.S.No.1484/2009, on the file of the XXXIX Addl. City Civil Judge, at Bangalore, dismissing the suit for perpetual injunction.
This Regular First Appeal coming on for Hearing, this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER Called again in the second round. None appear in this matter.
In this appeal of the year 2015, though the matter has been listed since October 2019 regularly and is coming up on several dates for hearing, the appellants have not appeared and addressed their arguments.
As such, the Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE bk/