Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Anil vs Kiritbhai

High Court Of Gujarat|04 May, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Shri Vora, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents has stated at the bar that as such the respondents are not in possession of the disputed suit property in question and one another person named, Shri Ashokbhai, is in possession of the suit property as a tenant. He has also stated at the bar that in view of the above, respondents nos. 1 and 2 as such do not claim any right and/or interest in the suit property in question either as a tenant or in another capacity. He has stated that an affidavit to the aforesaid effect is also filed by the respondents.
Shri Kunal Vaishnav, learned advocate appearing on behalf of Shri Amar Bhatt, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant seeks time to verify the above. Hence, stand over to 10/05/2012. To be placed at the top of the board.
(M.R.
SHAH, J.) siji Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Anil vs Kiritbhai

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
04 May, 2012