Hon'ble Mahendra Dayal,J.
On an objection being raised by the learned counsel for the opposite parties that the petitioner has got equally efficacious and alternative remedy in approaching the appropriate authority, learned counsel for the petitioner could not justify the Court as to why the petitioner may not be relegated to the alternative remedy of approaching the appropriate authority.
In the cases of United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon and others [(2010)8 SCC 110] and Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev and others v. State of Maharashtra and others [(2011)2 SCC 782], the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that the High Court should not interfere under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, if an efficacious alternative remedy is available to any aggrieved person.
In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
Order Date :- 11.9.2014 Muk