Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40022 of 2019 Applicant :- Anil Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Gyanendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in Case Crime No. 283 of 2019, under Sections 323, 452, 392, 411, 504 and 506 I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali, district-Ghaziabad, is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.
As per FIR the present accused along with other co-accused Deepak and two unknown persons came to the house of the informant and committed maar-peet with the husband of the informant and has forcibly taken Rs. 10,000/- from his pocket.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to some ulterior motive. He next submitted that the applicant had gone to the house of the complainant to take his money which he had given to the husband of the informant. There is no injury report on record, which indicates that the husband of the informant had sustained any injury. All the allegations which have been made against the applicant are totally false and frivolous. Further submission is that all the offences are triable by the court of Magistrate. He lastly submitted that the applicant has no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 8.4.2019 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned A.G.A.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of the punishment, submissions of learned counsel for the parties, considering the law laid down in the case of Data Ram Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2018(3) SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail during the pendency of the trial.
Let the applicant, Anil Kumar involved in the aforesaid case be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-
1. The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 26.9.2019 Faridul