Hon'ble Mahendra Dayal,J.
The advocates are abstaining from judicial work today.
We have heard learned Standing Counsel and perused the record.
The grievance of the petitioner is that he was appointed as Assistant District Government Counsel (Revenue) and has performed his duties accordingly but the remuneration/fees has been paid to him. He has already preferred a representation dated 8.1.2013 raising grievance to the District Magistrate, a copy of which has been annexed as Annexure No.4 to the writ petition, but the same has not been decided as yet.
Accordingly without entering into the merits of the case, we dispose of the the writ petition finally a direction to the District Magistrate, Bahraich to consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioner, contained in Annexure No.4 to the writ petition expeditiously.
Order Date :- 24.1.2014 Muk