Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Anil Kumar Dwivedi vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|06 January, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 79
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18197 of 2020 Applicant :- Anil Kumar Dwivedi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mukesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Devesh Nath Tiwari learned A.G.A for the State/opposite party no.1 and perused the record.
This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant to quash the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 5123 of 2019 (State through Drugs Inspector, District Farrukhabad vs. Anil Kumar Dwivedi), under Section 18/27 and 18A/28 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, P.S. Kampil, District Farrukhabad.
At the very out-set learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that he does not want to press the principal prayers made in this application. He is ready to submit to the jurisdiction of the court, seeks bail and accepts all the conditions which this Court may deem fit to impose upon him. The only prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant is for expeditious disposal of his bail application.
In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicant, the prayer, so far it relates to seeking quashing of the proceedings of complaint case as well as summoning order, stands refused.
However, it is directed that if the applicant appears and surrenders before the court below within 30 days from today and applies for bail, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.
For a period of 30 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. However, in case, the applicant does not appear before the Court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against him.
It is made clear that no application seeking extension of time shall be entertained if this order is not complied with within the aforesaid period.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 6.1.2021 S.S.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Anil Kumar Dwivedi vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
06 January, 2021
Judges
  • Vivek Varma
Advocates
  • Mukesh Kumar