Court No. - 42
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1182 of 2018 Revisionist :- Anil Kumar Agarwal And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Swetashwa Agarwal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Sri Swetashwa Agarwal, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Takeshwar Yadav, learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of opposite party no. 2 by Sri Manish Kumar Tripathi, the same is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has brought to the knowledge of this Court that charge has already been framed in this case against the revisionist, hence, the present revision has become infructuous.
Learned counsel for the revisionist has prayed that this revision may be dismissed as infructuous with liberty to file a fresh.
Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed as infructuous with liberty to file a fresh.
Order Date :- 27.4.2018 A.P. Pandey