Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Anil Krishan Srivastava vs State Of U.P. Thru ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 July, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is an employee of Uttar Pradesh Bhumi Sudhar Nigam. The Nigam has taken a decision to enhance the age of retirement from 58 years to 60 years. Even the State Government has tentatively considered the proposal favourably. Final decision in that regard, however, is pending at the end of the State viz. respondent no.1.
Sri Prashant Arora, Advocate, appearing for the respondent-State wants to seek instructions and file a counter affidavit.
List on 31.7.2012.
Order Date :- 25.7.2012 A.Nigam
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Anil Krishan Srivastava vs State Of U.P. Thru ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 July, 2012
Judges
  • Ajai Lamba