Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Anchal Shukla vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|07 April, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 36
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11702 of 2021 Applicant :- Anchal Shukla Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Tapan Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Heard Shri Om Narayan Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant may file his parcha in the registry.
By means of this application, the applicant, Anchal Shukla, who is involved in Case Crime No. 728/2020 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 483 & 34 IPC P.S. Roja, Distt. Shahjahanpur is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that a first information report was lodged in the aforesaid case crime against the applicant and others on 28.12.2020 regarding manufacturing of duplicate cement of different companies. The allegations is that on the information of mukhbir the police raided a godown. It is contended that the applicant has registered shop as Balaji Cement Associate started since 2018 and he is purchasing and selling cements. Till date there is no complaint against him either from the cement company, agency or by any of the consumer regarding forged or duplicate cement. It is alleged that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the aforesaid case crime. It is alleged that the said godown/closed factory belongs to one high level officer and till date no statement of the owner of the factory has been recorded. There is no independent witness of the said false recovery as alleged by the police. The applicant is languishing in jail since 28.12.2020. The applicant has no criminal history to his credit. In case the applicant is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage therefore, the applicant does not deserve any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will misuse the liberty of bail.
Having considered the submissions of the parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits, let the applicant Anchal Shukla involved in the aforesaid case, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through their counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against them in accordance with law.
(v) The applicant shall file computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
(vi) The computer generated copy of this order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.
(vii) The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
It is clarified that anything said in this order is limited to the purpose of determination of this bail application and will in no way be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. The trial court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of evidence led unaffected by anything said in this order.
Order Date :- 7.4.2021 SP/
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Anchal Shukla vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
07 April, 2021
Judges
  • Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Advocates
  • Tapan Kumar Mishra