Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Anant Ram Pathak And Another vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|18 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 53
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 28215 of 2018 Applicant :- Anant Ram Pathak And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shamim Uddin Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned AGA for the State.
This is an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the summoning order dated 15.02.2017 and charge sheet dated 09.09.2016 as well as bailable warrant dated 14.03.2018 against the applicants before the court of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad in Case Crime No. 1288 of 2016, under sections 323, 504, 452 IPC, P.S. Vijay Nagar, District Ghaziabad.
On perusal of the impugned charge sheet and the materials in support of the same, this Court does not find it to be a case which can be determined or gone into in an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. This Court cannot hold a parallel trial in an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No such ground appears to be available to the applicants, on the basis of which the impugned charge sheet can be quashed going by the settled law in R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283.
Accordingly, the prayer for quashing the charge sheet, summoning order and bailable warrant is refused.
However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is provided that if the applicants appear and surrender before the court below within 45 days from today and apply for bail, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.
For a period of 45 days from today or till the applicants surrender whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. However, in case, the applicants do not appear before the court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against them.
With the aforesaid directions, the application is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 18.8.2018 Imroz
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Anant Ram Pathak And Another vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
18 August, 2018
Judges
  • J J
Advocates
  • Shamim Uddin Khan