Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Anand Y S And Others vs State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|12 March, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION NOS.2277-2278 OF 2018(GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1. ANAND Y.S.
S/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS YADAKAMARANAHALLI VILLAGE UYYAMBALLI HOBLI KANAKAPURA TALUK-562126 RAMANAGARA DISTRICT.
2. MURALI N.
S/O NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS RESIDING AT TATTANAHALLI VILLAGE ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK-562107 BENGALURU DISTRICT ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI REUBEN JACOB, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ATTIBELE POLICE STATION BENGALURU DISTRICT – 562107 REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL PUBLLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU – 560 001.
2. MUNIRAJU S/O LATE KASHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS RESIDING AT BANDIKODIGENAHALLI VILLAGE JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU – 562149.
... RESPONDENTS THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CRIME NO. 333/2017 DATED 23.09.2017 LODGED BY RESPONDENT NO.1-POLICE VIDE ANNE-A IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS (ACCUSED NOS.1 & 2) ARE CONCERNED.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo stating thereunder that the prayer sought for in the petitions has become infructuous.
Memo is placed on record.
Petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
SD/-
JUDGE sac*
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Anand Y S And Others vs State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
12 March, 2019
Judges
  • Aravind Kumar