Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Anand Vijay vs Rowena Patrao

High Court Of Karnataka|02 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 56044 OF 2018 (GM FC) BETWEEN:
ANAND VIJAY SON OF LATE VIJAY SASNUR AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT 2266 FARMCREST ST MILPITAS CA 95036 USA REPRESENTED BY HIS GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNY HODLER VIDYULLATA SASNUR.
(BY SRI. L GOVINDARAJ, ADVOCATE) ... PETITIONER AND:
ROWENA PATRAO AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT NO.0-5, BLOCK B ADARSH CRISTAL APARTMENTS OPPOSITE FRANK ANTHONY PUBLIC SCHOOL CAMBRIDGE LAYOUT BANGALORE - 560 008.
... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. NITHYA RAJA SHEKAR., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT OR QUASHE THE ORDER DATED 03.11.2018 MADE ON I.A. NO. 12 IN G & WC.NO 29/2018 PASSED BY THE III ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BANGALORE IN SO FAR AS IT DENIEES THE PETITIONER INTERIM CUSTODY OF THE 2 CHILDREN FOR 50% OF THE CHRISTMAS VACATIONS. (ANNEXURE-E).
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R A memo is filed for withdrawal stating that the parties to the proceedings have entered into a settlement. The memo is taken on record and the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
SD/- JUDGE nv
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Anand Vijay vs Rowena Patrao

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
02 December, 2019
Judges
  • B M Shyam Prasad