Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Anand Pradhan vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14565 of 2018 Petitioner :- Anand Pradhan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Janam Singh,Rajeshwar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
Heard Shri Ram Janam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Anil Mehrotra, learned counsel for the respondents nos.2 and 3.
This writ petition is full of factual controversies. From the averments made in the writ petition, it appears that the petitioner is merely a trespasser and unauthorised occupant in the premises. It is open to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedy, which they may have under the law. We are not inclined to entertain this petition at this stage.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 26.4.2018 pks
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Anand Pradhan vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 April, 2018
Judges
  • Bharati Sapru
Advocates
  • Ram Janam Singh Rajeshwar Singh