Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Anand Kumar Srivastava vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 50
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18908 of 2019 Petitioner :- Anand Kumar Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Atiqur Rahman Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ved Byas Mishra
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
Heard the counsel for the parties.
The present writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to consider the claim of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Senior Clerk.
It has been stated in paragraph No. 5 of the writ petition that the petitioner was named in Crime No. 238 of 2011, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code.
There is no averment in the writ petition that the petitioner has been acquitted of the charges.
In view of the aforesaid, it is not a fit case for grant of mandamus as prayed by the petitioner in exercise of the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 29.11.2019 Anurag/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Anand Kumar Srivastava vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 November, 2019
Judges
  • Salil Kumar Rai
Advocates
  • Atiqur Rahman Siddiqui