Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Anand Kumar Sharma vs State Election Commission Thru ' Secy & Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 May, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 22363 of 2004 Petitioner :- Anand Kumar Sharma Respondent :- State Election Commission Thru' Secy. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Radha Kant Ojha,Satyanshu Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,P.N. Rai,Tahira Kazmi,Tarun Agrawal
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
List revised. Case called out. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition.
Learned standing counsel is present.
It appears that either cause of action does not survive or the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the writ petition or there is no merit. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. Stay order, if any, is vacated.
Liberty is granted to the petitioner to move a recall application within 30 days, if he feels that the writ petition still survives.
With the aforesaid observations, the Writ Petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 30.5.2018 NLY
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Anand Kumar Sharma vs State Election Commission Thru ' Secy & Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 May, 2018
Judges
  • Surya Prakash
Advocates
  • Radha Kant Ojha Satyanshu Ojha