Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2010
  6. /
  7. January

Anand Kumar Pandey vs State Of U.P.Through The Prin. ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 June, 2010

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Vedpal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Advocate.
Under challenge in the instant writ petition is FIR relating to Case Crime No. 214 of 2010, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 and 506 IPC read with Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, police station Jethwara, district Pratapgarh.
We have gone through the FIR, which discloses commission of cognizable offence, as such, the same cannot be quashed.
The writ petition is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed.
However, considering the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegations levelled in the FIR are trivial in nature and the petitioner had already moved an application under Section-9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, we hereby provided that if the petitioner surrenders and moves application for bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the courts below expeditiously.
Order Date :- 24.6.2010 Chauhan/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Anand Kumar Pandey vs State Of U.P.Through The Prin. ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 June, 2010