IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.36444/2019(GM-POLICE) BETWEEN M/S AMRUTH RECRETION ASSOCIATION HONNAMMA LAYOUT VEERASAGARA LAYOUT DABASPET SOMPURA HOBLI NELAMANGALA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY SRI H P SURESH S/O LATE PUTTAHONNAIAH AGD ABOUT 45 YEARS R/O HONNENAHALLI VILLAGE BARAGENAHALLI POST SOMPURA HOBLI NELAMANGALA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT ... PETITIONER (BY SRI SATISH M DODDAMANI, ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING BENGALURU-560001 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU-562 123 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE NELAMANGALA TALUK, NELAMANGALA-562 123 4. THE POLICE INSPECTOR NELAMANGALA TALUK NELAMANGALA-562 123 5. THE POLICE SUB- INSPECTOR DABASPET NELAMANGALA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT -562 123 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VIJAY KUMAR A. PATIL, AGA) - - -
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NOT INTERFERE WITH THE DAY TO DAY ACTIVITIES OF THE PETITIONER'S SOCIETY AND NOT TO PREVENT ANY OF ITS MEMBERS FROM USING THE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri Satish M. Doddamani, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri. Vijay Kumar A. Patil, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents.
The petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
2. In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with day to day activities of the petitioner’s Society and not to prevent any of its members from using the Recreational facilities.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the parties submit that the controversy involved in the instant writ petition is squarely covered by an order dated 19.10.2016 in Review Petition No.200029/2016.
4. In view of the aforesaid submissions and with a view to maintain parity, writ petition is disposed of with the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall install within a period of six weeks, CC TV cameras, at the places of access to its members and also at all the places, wherein game(s) is / are played by the members. The CC TV footage of atleast prior 15 days’ period shall be made available by the petitioner to the jurisdictional police, as and when called upon to do so.
(ii) The petitioner shall issue identity card(s) to all its member(s), which shall be produced by the member(s), when called upon by the concerned police, during the raid(s), survelliance, etc.
(iii) The petitioner shall not permit any activity by any of its member(s), by indulging in acts of amusement, falling within the definition of Ss.2(14) & 2(15) of the Act and shall not permit any game(s) of chance as per Explanation (II) of Sub-section (7) of Section 2 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The member(s) shall not be allowed to play any kind of game(s) with stakes or make any profit or gain out of the game(s) played.
(iv) The petitioner shall put proper mechanism in place and shall ensure that no game(s) is played in any unlawful manner by the member(s). If the jurisdictional police find the game(s) played is/are contrary to any law and in violation of the settled practice, it is open to them to take action against the petitioner and the offenders, in accordance with law.
(v) The jurisdictional police shall have liberty to visit premises periodically and/or on receipt of any information about any unlawful activity being carried on in the petitioner’s premises.
(vi) The respondents are directed not to interfere with the lawful recreational activities carried on by the members of the petitioner’s – Club/Association.
(vii) It is made clear that this order would not come in the way of the jurisdictional police invoking the provisions of the Act and taking action in accordance with law, if the member(s) of the petitioner is/are found to have indulged in any unlawful or immoral activities.
No order as to costs.
Sd/- JUDGE TL