1. Mr. Mehta, learned senior advocate with Ms.Vidhi Bhatt and Ms. Shah, learned advocate for respondent No.1 company and Mr. Thakkar, learned advocate for respondent No.2.
2. In view of the contention raised in the petition, particularly with reference to the show cause notice vis-a-vis the impugned order and also with reference to the allotment of retail outlet with reference to respondent No.2, the petition requires consideration.
3. Rule
4. Ms. Shah, learned advocate for respondent No.1 company and Mr. Thakker, learned advocate for respondent No.2 waive service of rule on behalf of respondent respondents No.1 and 2 respectively. In view of the fact that the Letter of Intent has been issued in December 2011, at this stage, any interim SCA/14466/2011 2/2 ORDER relief against the said Letter of Intent is not granted, however, it is clarified that the allotment of retail outlet to respondent No.2 will be subject to the final decision which may be passed in the said petition.
5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, Rule is made returnable on 17.9.2012.
(K.M. Thaker, J.) Bharat*