Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Amrit Saravagi vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 October, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 81
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 14582 of 2021 Applicant :- Amrit Saravagi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Naveen Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
By means of the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the applicant has sought for a suitable direction to the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- I, Gorakhpur to consider and decide the Complaint Case No. 654 of 2019 (Amrit Saravagi Vs. Vikas Agrwal) dated 27.02.2019, under Section 138 N.I. Act, Police Station Cantt, District Gorakhpur.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the aforesaid case is pending and thus a suitable direction may be issued to the concerned Court to decide the same within specific time.
No useful purpose would be served in keeping the application pending, which is finally disposed of with a direction to the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- I, Gorakhpur to consider and decide the Complaint Case No. 654 of 2019 (Amrit Saravagi Vs. Vikas Agrwal) dated 27.02.2019, under Section 138 N.I. Act, Police Station Cantt, District Gorakhpur, expeditiously, in accordance with law, without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the party, provided there is no legal impediment.
Order Date :- 29.10.2021 SK Srivastava
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Amrit Saravagi vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 October, 2021
Judges
  • Naveen Srivastava
Advocates
  • Sanjay Maurya