Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Amrit Lal vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 August, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 10
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10416 of 2021 Petitioner :- Amrit Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Surjit Kumar,Vaibhav Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Azad Rai
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
From the record, it appears that the petitioner is aggrieved by certain encroachments over Plot No.845 area 0.510 hectare, which according to petitioner is a rasta.
Learned Standing Counsel submits that if that is the case, the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy to approach the Authority concerned under Sections 25/26 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for the removal of the encroachment.
Under such circumstances, no interference is, therefore, warranted in the writ petition. The petitioner, if he is so advised, may approach the authorities under section 25/26 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 24.8.2021 Siddhant
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Amrit Lal vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 August, 2021
Judges
  • Siddhartha Varma
Advocates
  • Surjit Kumar Vaibhav Kumar