Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Amjad vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 October, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33358 of 2021 Applicant :- Amjad Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Deena Nath Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,D.M.Tripathi
Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
Let the supplementary affidavit filed today in Court be taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the entire record.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No. 388 of 2021 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 504, 506, 307 IPC, Police Station - Dhoomanganj, District - Prayagraj (Allahabad) with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail.
A First Information Report was lodged on 01.05.2021 against as many as three named accused persons including present applicant Amjad and three unknown persons. In the said report it was alleged by complainant Samsher that near Chhote Imambada at about 7:30 P.M. on 30.04.2021 he and his nephew Hamdan were sitting. The accused persons were abusing and indiscriminately fired at them and one shot hit on the thigh of the complainant's nephew Hamdan. Thereafter, the accused persons escaped away shouting to kill all. It was also mentioned in the report that about twenty rounds of firing was made.
The contention as raised at the Bar by learned counsel for the applicant is that applicant-accused is quite innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted by the learned counsel for applicant that no specific role has been assigned to the present accused and the present accused has been nominated in the case on the general allegation of assault on the injured. It is also argued that the injured had received injuries on non vital party of his body that's to say on thigh and the doctor has not opined that the alleged injury on thigh was fatal to the life of injured. Lastly, it is argued that the applicant is in jail since 03.06.2021 and that in case applicant is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the submission of learned counsel for the parties, period of detention of the applicant, considering that nature of injuries, considering the accused persons are alleged to be six in number causing only one injury on the thigh of the injured and considering all other attending facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, at this stage, prima facie, a case for bail has been made out.
The prayer for bail is granted. The application is allowed.
Let applicant Amjad involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties to the satisfaction of court concerned subject to the following conditions:-
(1). The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law;
(2). The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code;
(3). In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court may initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(4). The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by the learned counsel for the applicant alongwith a self attested identity proof of the said persons (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number (s) to which the said Aadhar Card is linked before the concerned Court/Authority/Official.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 27.10.2021 LBY
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Amjad vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 October, 2021
Judges
  • Ajit Singh
Advocates
  • Deena Nath