Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Amit vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 60
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15790 of 2018 Applicant :- Amit Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Giri,Uday Bhan Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ravindra Nath Kakkar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The present bail application has been filed for enlarging the applicant on bail in case Crime No.1589 of 2017, under Section 2/3 U. P. Gangsters Act and Ante Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, PS- Sihani Gate, District-Ghaziabad.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. It is next contended that as per gang chart three cases alleged to have shown against the applicant being Case Crime No. 994 of 2017, under Section 398/401 I.P.C.; Case Crime No.914 of 2017, under Sections 457, 380, 411 I.P.C.; Case Crime No. 987 of 2017, under Sections 380, 411 I.P.C. and in the aforesaid cases applicant has been granted bail, copy of the bail orders are annexed as Annexure-3 to 5 to the affidavit accompanying the bail application. It is next contended that there is also no possibility of his either fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and he is in jail since 27.03.2018. Hence the applicant should be released on bail.
Learned A.G.A. has, however, opposed the prayer for bail to the applicant but admitted the fact that applicant has been granted bail in the aforementioned cases shown against him in the gang chart.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submission of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.
Let applicant Amit be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity.
(ii) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
(iv) The applicant shall regularly appear on the dates fixed by the trial court unless his personal attendance is exempted by the trial court.
In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, it will be open to the opposite parties to approach the Court for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 30.4.2018 AKT
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Amit vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 April, 2018
Judges
  • Ravindra Nath Kakkar
Advocates
  • Vivek Giri Uday Bhan Mishra