Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Amit vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|16 August, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2288 of 2021 Applicant :- Amit Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjive Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Heard Sri Sanjiv Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further argued that offences levelled in the present matter are not attracted. Although victim is major and married lady but she has not stated any thing in the statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. to attract the offence under Section 376 (3) IPC. It was further argued that if entire prosecution case is taken into consideration then it will be a case of offence under Section 363 IPC. It was further argued that FIR was lodged on the basis of false facts. Medical evidence does not support the oral version. Applicant is in jail since 18.04.2020 having no criminal history and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
On the other hand, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of the offence, complicity of the accused, scrutinizing the facts mentioned in the FIR, statement of witnesses recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., medical evidence and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Amit involved in Case Crime No. 54 of 2020, under Sections 363, 376 (3) I.P.C. and Section 3/ 4 POCSO Act, P.S. Ushait, District Budaun be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions :
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
6. The party shall file self attested computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
7. The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.
Order Date :- 16.8.2021 Sachdeva
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Amit vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
16 August, 2021
Judges
  • Om Prakash Vii
Advocates
  • Sanjive Kumar Gupta